🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, the game developers introduced a new playlist titled Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option mirrors the standard Breakthrough format but includes several notable changes:

• Every squad includes just 8 human participants, with the rest filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions done by real players award full XP, while bot actions provide reduced XP.
• Only two maps can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Features like Dogtags, accolades, and career stat updates have been turned off.

In short, this mode delivers on its name: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, you might think it's a good idea, since it gives more options for players looking for different ways to have fun with the title. But, gaming history have taught us anything, it's that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 players are upset.

Community Responses: From Fury to Praise

"People want human opponents. Don't repeat the errors of your competitors," reads a response to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking idea," comments another. Meanwhile, in community forums, a player remarks, "I have no idea where we are headed with this game," while someone else details everything they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, for every complaint, some gamers sharing how much they're enjoying the new mode. "It's enjoyable to practice, real players keep it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," reads one Reddit comment. "This subreddit fails to see that there are gamers who have lives and can't play this game all the time. Allow them to strike a balance," states another. A response on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," while another applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Concerns and Community Input

All that said, players have valid points to criticize Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have pointed out that it will make queue times more extended for different playlists due to the large amount of options currently available. On a similar note, some areas already encounter AI-filled matches in the current modes. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of human gamers, even though it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Finally, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide full XP, even against bots, but that was removed when they attempted to remove XP farming from the mode. So Casual Breakthrough seems like the player base meeting them in the middle, as per a Reddit comment. A different user describes this mode as the devs "making a mistake significantly, I had great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Occur?

Should Battlefield Studios has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it's that they're listening and acting on player input. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, should analytics shows this recent mode is underperforming to their standards, they will not hesitate to change it again.